Votre Panier (0)

Votre panier est vide.

Comparaisons Indépendantes

Comment Mam Nature Swiss se Compare-t-il ?

Comparaisons basées sur les données et la technologie contre les approches les plus courantes — osmose inverse, eau en bouteille, filtres à pichet, adoucisseurs et purificateurs UV.

PFAS Removal Guide

Best PFAS Water Filters 2026

Independently tested water filters ranked by PFAS removal certification, coverage, and value. Updated March 2026.

PFAS rankingIndependent testingShort-chain PFASBuyer guide

#1 Rated

Mam Nature Swiss #1 — only system with ETH Zurich full-spectrum PFAS certification.

Technology Comparisons

Filtre Maison vs. Osmose Inverse

Comment l'adsorption sélective se compare-t-elle aux membranes OI sur l'élimination des PFAS, la rétention des minéraux, le gaspillage d'eau et le coût sur 10 ans ?

PFAS removalMineral retentionWater waste10-year cost

Verdict

L'adsorption sélective l'emporte pour la plupart des foyers. OI préférable pour les puits à haute teneur en nitrates.

Filtre Maison vs. Eau en Bouteille

Une famille de 4 personnes dépense 600–1 500 €/an en eau en bouteille. Mam Nature remplace cela entièrement — depuis chaque robinet.

Annual costZero plastic wasteWhole-house

Verdict

L'eau du robinet filtrée l'emporte sur le coût, l'écologie et l'équilibre minéral.

Filtre Maison vs. Adoucisseur d'Eau

Les adoucisseurs traitent le tartre mais n'éliminent pas les PFAS ni les métaux lourds. Mam Nature fait les deux — sans sel.

PFAS removalNo saltLimescale protection

Verdict

Mam Nature élimine les contaminants et traite le tartre. Les adoucisseurs traitent seulement le tartre.

Whole House vs. Under-Sink Filters

Point-of-entry filters protect every tap and shower. Under-sink filters treat one tap. Which approach is right for your home?

CoverageBathing waterCost per litre

Verdict

Whole-house protects all exposure routes. Under-sink is a budget-friendly starting point.

Whole House Filter vs. UV Purifiers

UV kills bacteria but cannot remove chemicals. Filtration removes PFAS and heavy metals but does not disinfect. Which do you need?

PFAS removalBacteriaMunicipal vs. well water

Verdict

Filtration for municipal water. UV for well water. Both for complete protection.

Brand Comparisons

Whole House vs. Pitcher Filter

Mam Nature Swiss vs. Brita

Brita filters one jug at a time. Mam Nature filters every tap, shower, and appliance in your home.

PFAS removalWhole-houseCost per litreBathing water

Verdict

Mam Nature for whole-house protection. Brita for single-tap taste improvement.

Filter vs. Softener

Mam Nature Swiss vs. BWT

BWT softens water but does not remove PFAS or heavy metals. Mam Nature does both — without salt.

PFAS removalNo saltMineral retentionLimescale

Verdict

Mam Nature for health protection + limescale. BWT for limescale only.

Competitor Comparison

Mam Nature Swiss vs. Aquasana

Both are whole-house filters, but certification depth differs significantly — especially for PFAS.

PFAS certificationETH Zurich vs. NSFMineral retention

Verdict

Mam Nature for certified full-spectrum PFAS removal. Aquasana for longer filter intervals.

Whole House vs. Gravity Filter

Mam Nature Swiss vs. Berkey

Berkey is a countertop gravity filter popular in off-grid communities. Mam Nature is a certified whole-house system.

CoverageCertificationRegulatory statusFlow rate

Verdict

Mam Nature for certified whole-house protection. Berkey for portable off-grid use.

Filtration vs. Ionizer

Mam Nature Swiss vs. Kangen Water

Kangen machines alter pH through electrolysis but do not remove contaminants. Mam Nature removes PFAS and heavy metals.

PFAS removalAlkaline claimsMLM pricingScience

Verdict

Mam Nature for certified contaminant removal. Kangen does not filter contaminants.

Whole House vs. Under-Sink Carbon

Mam Nature Swiss vs. Carbonit

Carbonit is popular in Germany for under-sink carbon filtration. Mam Nature offers whole-house selective adsorption with full PFAS certification.

PFAS spectrumCoverageDACH marketFilter lifespan

Verdict

Mam Nature for full PFAS protection + whole-house. Carbonit for affordable single-tap.

Whole House vs. Kitchen Tap

Mam Nature Swiss vs. Grohe Blue

Grohe Blue is a premium kitchen tap with filtered and sparkling water. Mam Nature protects your entire home.

CoverageCarbonationPFAS removalKitchen design

Verdict

Mam Nature for whole-house health protection. Grohe Blue for carbonated kitchen water.

Whole House Filter Comparison

Mam Nature Swiss vs. 3M

3M Aqua-Pure uses activated carbon. Mam Nature uses selective adsorption with full PFAS certification from ETH Zurich.

PFAS certificationStainless steel vs. plasticWarranty

Verdict

Mam Nature for certified PFAS removal + Swiss quality. 3M for basic chlorine/sediment.

Commercial Water Filtration

Mam Nature Swiss vs. BRITA Professional

BRITA Professional filters water at individual machines. Mam Nature Commercial filters all water entering the building.

Whole-buildingHotels & restaurantsPFAS removalScale

Verdict

Mam Nature for whole-building protection. BRITA Pro for machine-specific optimization.

Comparaison Indépendante

Tous les Systèmes de Traitement de l'Eau — Comparés

Eau du robinet, eau en bouteille, filtres à pichet, osmose inverse, adoucisseurs et purificateurs UV — tous évalués selon les critères qui comptent pour votre santé.

10/12
Score Mam Nature
Le seul système qui élimine simultanément les PFAS, préserve les minéraux, protège contre le tartre et couvre toute la maison — sans sel ni électricité.
← → Scroll to compare all systems
Critère
Mam Nature Swiss
Mam Nature Swiss
Selective adsorption · ETH Zurich
Tap Water
Unfiltered municipal supply
Bottled Water
Single-use plastic
Pitcher Filter
Brita / activated carbon
Reverse Osmosis
Under-sink membrane
Water Softener
Ion-exchange / salt-based
UV Purifier
Ultraviolet disinfection
PFAS removal
ETH Zurich certified >96–>98.5% for Mam Nature
Heavy metals (Pb, As, Cd)
up to 99.98% removal via selective adsorption
BPA
Chlorine & taste
Minerals retained (Ca, Mg)
WHO recommends 25–50 mg/L Mg, 50–100 mg/L Ca
Limescale protection
Bacteria & viruses
Whole-house coverage
Zero plastic waste
Annual household cost~€100–200/yr€0 (utility)€600–1,500/yr€80–120/yr€150–300/yr€200–500/yr€100–200/yr
No wastewater produced
RO systems waste 3–4× the water they filter
Storage tank required
RO needs pressurized tank; softener needs brine tank
NoneNoneBottles (external)None4–10 L pressurizedBrine tankNone
No electricity needed
Annual maintenance
Cartridge, membrane, salt, or lamp replacement
Score total10/125/124/124/124/124/125/12
Oui / Efficace
Partiel / Limité
Non applicable / Non

Découvrir le Système Complet

Certifié ETH Zurich. >96–>98,5 % d'élimination des PFAS. Minéraux préservés. Zéro gaspillage d'eau.

Découvrir le Set Complet Plus →